Maybe Steps

 Another Maybe step this week. Checking in on the Bards & Cards Discord server, I saw someone looking for someone to run a Pathfinder 1e campaign. While I'm not particularly a fan of the system, I have invested in it, mostly at my wife's urging, and have run a session or two.So I answered that I could run something. Now we're actively looking for more players. Maybe it'll be something, maybe it won't.

Even though Pathfinder is not the game I would have chosen to run for my first campaign in ages, I'm realizing that I really needed a good swift kick to get myself moving. Even though I've got other things on my mind, I'm not developing them to the point where anything is actually going to happen. Which keeps me away from gaming. It's like the saying goes "The perfect is the enemy of the good." I've been waiting for things to be perfect, and therefore missing out on things that would have been, at very least, good.

Even if this doesn't become anything, it's at least a reminder that I should get back in the mix sooner rather than later.

Even though I don't think I have the ability to pull out a novel for NaNoWriMo in November, I'm thinking of trying to flex my creative muscles. There's a solo journaling RPG called Apothecary that I picked up from the Bundle of Holding recently that looks interesting. So at least for November, I'll try to play a little bit and post my results here.

I think my last post came out really muddy because I kinda solved the dilemma I was looking at sort of in the middle of working it out on the screen. What happened to my playstyle and the way I think about games? I shifted to player-driven gaming over GM-driven gaming. I don't have to worry about gearing my scenarios towards different taste groups because I let the players themselves decide what they do. If someone wants to fight, they can pick fights if they want. If someone wants to talk, they can do that too.

The gaming Meetup group met on Saturday and I was one of the 2 GMs offering to run games for attendees. And the other guy was just "I didn't plan to run something, but I have a game later tonight, so I've got my stuff." I ran a quick game of InSpectres, since it's October and therefore time for spoopy things.

I'm planning to run a session at Bards & Cards (the game store that's nearest to me) closer to Halloween and it was a good chance to get some practice in.

I had mentioned intending to run The Great Ork Gods, but I realized that the edgy humor that was the inspiration of the game isn't quite as funny these days. I do remember having fun, and am interested in trying it out again, but I want to come up with a scenario that would actually be funny.

My current thought is to have a scenario where the orks are running from a dragon that devoured the rest of their tribe. They're on their way to warn/join the neighboring tribe, but have to pass through a human village along the way. So even though they are not there to raid and pillage, the humans assume that they're there to raid and pillage, and so the scenario is actually them trying to make it through this village without raiding and pillaging it because they know a dragon is coming this way.

Or maybe a straight up raiding and pillaging scenario, but they're doing it because the humans raided and pillaged them and they're just trying to get their stuff back.

Always Be Playing

 Believe it or not, this post is inspired by my experiences at Wasteland Weekend. In order to cover the cost of my ticket, I volunteered to help the event happen. This mostly consisted of patrolling the grounds overnight one night and again on the last day as the attendees were filing out. As it turns out, Wastelanders are a well-behaved lot, so the patrolling was very uneventful. Which gave me lots of time to get to know my patrol partners, and it turns out that a couple of them were D&D players. (It would be great if they were into other RPGs as well, but I'll take what I can get.)

At one point in one conversation, there was the classic discussion of the balance between combat and roleplay/social interaction. Everyone has their own opinion, so it's a conversation I've had dozens of times over the many years I've been gaming. The idea that an RPG plot is fight scenes separated by talking, or social scenes in between fights..When I was running games much more regularly than I am now, this was part of my adventure writing rubric.

But this time, my brain rebelled. Since that time, how I game, how I GM and how I think about gaming had changed so much that it felt like we were having the wrong conversation. 

The big shift, when you get down to it is from GM-driven campaigns to player-driven campaigns.

There's nothing necessarily wrong with GM-driven gaming. When I wrote my D20 Modern tabloid-world nostalgia adventure, I dove right back in to my old adventure writing methods, which were still in that GM-driven model. And "social interaction vs. combat" is still something that I need to think about, because even if I'm not railroading, I'm still providing a structure to the scenario.

In a player driven game, the players have much more impact on the play experience. In my OSR megadungeon campaign, the players decided which hallway to go down and which door to open.Fiasco and InSpectres both lean heavily on player input to create the plot, with Fiasco not even having a designated GM role. The debate between social interaction and combat is lessened for a couple of reasons. Firstly, the GM has less of a role in setting the pace of the game, Secondly, being player driven means that the players can call for the types of scenes that they prefer. In the megaidungeon, players can choose which section of the dungeon they want to explore. In InSpectres and Fiasco, the players have a degree of control over the narrative itself and can directly call for the things they want to see in the game.

I don't know if this is a deep thought or just me rambling, but I felt like I needed to get it out.

Feeling Wasted

 Don't worry. That's actually kind of a good thing.

While gaming conventions have been thin on the ground the last few years, my wife has been dragging me to Wasteland Weekend for the last 3 events (I'd say 3 years, but there was a 2020 in the middle there, so the 3 events happened over 4 years).

It's pretty cool. You basically spend 5 days hanging out pretending to be extras in the background of a Mad Max movie. If you want to get deep into the LARP angle, there are tribes and factions and missions that you can do. I keep meaning to get into that stuff, but I never quite manage. The tribes and factions also manage a lot of the entertainment. There is a main stage with live bands most nights, but there are also smaller events in other spaces. One night, I did karaoke in the Wreck Room. Another day, I visited the Slammer for a cabaret/burlesque show themed around villains.

The thing that sucks is that my wife and I don't drive, so we have to do a lot of wrangling in order to attend because 1) The event is held in the middle of the desert, and therefore 2) The only lodging available is what you bring in. Think about the amount of stuff you would need to go camping for 5 days, then modify that for desert conditions and further modify for having to carry all of this yourself for some portion of the journey.

 We finally managed to make it home last night after train service interruptions made everything take much longer than it should have and cost a bit more, too.

So as fun as it is, I'm also thinking about how the annoyance and effort and expense create a counter-balance to that fun. If things tip too far to the annoyance side, it might be something we don't do again (much to the chagrin of my wife).

Here are a couple of pictures of me in my Wasteland gear. The first photo is pretty much my original costume. You have to have a costume to contribute to the illusion for everyone else. unlike a Renaissance faire where there's a clear divide between the participants and the tourists, Wasteland Weekend wants everyone invested in selling the post-apocalyptic vibe. I think a lot of people do a basic "military surplus" look early on to meet the basic requirement and upgrade as time passes. The second look is built around that chest piece. There's a funny story about how I got it that I may tell some time, but I count myself very lucky to have it and built a sort of second costume around it.

I do have other photos, but that would take some sorting and more brainpower than I really have right now.

The Orc Baby Dilemma or Whether Good Has To Be Nice

 This is something that popped into my head over the week and I felt the need to write about it.

For those not in the know, the "Orc Baby Dilemma" is an old chestnut of D&D lore. Just to explain the scenario requires some setup.

First we have alignments. You may have heard of them. There are all sorts of "alignment chart" memes out there with the 3 x 3 grid of alignments. In D&D, the 2 axes of alignment are Law vs. Chaos and Good vs. Evil, with Neutral in the middle of each. So you can be Lawful Neutral or Neutral Good, along with Chaotic Evil and so on.

Next we have the paladin class. This character class has several special powers, but in order to maintain them must maintain a Lawful Good alignment. Which tends to make them unpopular among certain Dungeon Masters. For one thing, the special powers have the potential to make exciting encounters deflate as the party can now steamroll over them. The other issue is that the player is so dedicated to keeping their Lawful Good alignment that they often don't bite at all of the adventure hooks that the DM presents.

The Orc Baby Dilemma then exists as a brute force method to force the paladin to "fall" and lose their powers. The premise is simple: The party has probably killed all of the orcs at an encampment/dungeon lair and as they are looting, they encounter an orc baby. And the DM asks the player if they kill the orc baby.

There are two possible outcomes.

1) The paladin refuses to kill the baby orc. But since it's an orc, it's bound to grow up to become just as evil and marauding as its parents. The paladin loses their powers since they failed to stop the potential evil from happening.

2) The paladin kills the baby. The paladin loses their powers because they have harmed an innocent, who has done no wrong.

To be clear, this is a Stupid DM Trick. It's not terribly smart or clever and only exists to smack around players and their characters.

But it does bring up perspectives on alignment in an interesting way.

One of the things that's been debated for almost as long as alignment has existed is exactly what alignment is. The two main schools of thought are that 1) Alignment is about your behavior and 2) Alignment is about your position relative to cosmological forces.

Most discussions lean on the first school, that alignment is about behavior. If you are Good-aligned, then you are a good person. If you stop acting like a good person, you cease to be of Good alignment. That's one of the things that enables the Orc Baby Dilemma to work.

But alignment entered the D&D game through the inspiration of the Elric stories by Micheal Moorcock, in which the forces of Law and Chaos are in eternal struggle, and as D&D's cosmology expanded, the idea of a cosmological origin (or at least reflection) of alignment makes a lot of sense. There are many spells and items that have specific effects that depend on the user or subject having a specific alignment.

In this model, what determines your alignment is the faction you've chosen to support when Law and Chaos, and/or Good and Evil do battle with each other. It's also useful because one of the core activities of D&D is violence, and killing is not considered a "nice" thing to do. Being aligned with the Forces of Good does not require you to be nice. You may not even by required to be particularly good. Just so long as your actions advance the cause of Good in the world.

This is the point where I started feeling smug about how I had figured things out, but then the Orc Baby Dilemma popped into my head. And then I deflated.

Because in the cosmological interpretation, the Orc Baby Dilemma is not a dilemma at all. There's a clear answer. Kill the baby.

The Forces of Good have little interest in whether or not a paladin is nice, so whether or not the baby is innocent is not a real consideration. The paladin has presumably killed a large number of orcs of many ages. So the only standard is whether the action harms the Forces of Evil.

That thought disturbed me for a while.

If there's a saving grace here, it's that in the cosmological interpretation, the requirements of behavior are fairly loose. While there's no barrier to killing the baby, there's also no strong incentive.

I think that's my next question: What behavior or actions would cause a paladin to fall (or any other person to change alignment) under the cosmological interpretation?

 It was the monthly RPG Meetup last Saturday.

I only got two players for my "It's Not My Fault!" Fate Accelerated game. While Fate isn't like D&D in that it assumes a certain minimum party size, the premise of "It's Not My Fault!" is that the story starts in the midst of a sticky situation and the players are supposed to fill in details as they blame their woes on the next person at the table. With only 2 players and me (for the purposes of fleshing out the scenario, I participated in the "It's Not My Fault!" portion of the game, while serving as GM for the resulting scenario), there was a limited number of juicy and interesting details that were brought up.

The good news is that I now feel like I have sunk my teeth into Fate. When trying out new RPG systems, it can be tempting to treat it as just another way to build characters and roll dice. And that's kinda what it felt like in my prior experiences with Fate. But this time, I made a point of going over things, deciding which of the 4 actions that people were doing, how they used their Create Advantage actions to create Aspects and all of that fun stuff. There were a couple of fights so we got to explore Stress and Consequences. There are always things that I would like to have done better, but it's definitely something I want to try again.

But for the Meetup next month, I think I'll try to run The Great Ork Gods, which is a comedy game about playing Orks as well as their Gods, who hate them.

I don't know if I'll get a lot of gaming in during the interim because I'll be going to Wasteland Weekend near the end of the month and that should be exciting enough by itself.

Has it been that long?

 Well, I had a little breathing room from these weekly updates, which is nice. It feels like I don't do enough or not enough happens to really justify a weekly update. But at the same time, I don't want to lose the habit of blogging again.

I've been playing Magic at Bards & Cards, which is the name of my Friendly Local Gaming Store. It might just be my generation, but I'm very careful about posting "identifying" information freely online. It was probably a few years before I got around to mentioning the name of the city I lived in because of that.

I'm not great at the game, but that's not the point. It's to create a point of contact with other gamers/nerds. And it's doing that rather well.

I also got a chance to play Dungeon Crawl Classics. The gaming Meetup group I belong to posted a Dungeon Crawl Classics one-shot at Bards & Cards, which was something that I just couldn't refuse. The GM was very well prepared, with sheets of pregenerated characters and laminated maps of the scenario's combat encounters. Since it was a pick up game of DCC, the adventure was a "character funnel:" a scenario for large numbers of 0-level characters such that whoever survives achieves 1st level and becomes a proper adventurer.

Everyone started with 4 characters printed on a single sheet of paper. Whenever one died, the GM had a stamp that said "Dead" on it and he would stamp the section of the page that was that character. All of my characters died, but the important thing is that I had fun.

Next week is the monthly Meetup group meeting. I'm bringing the "It's Not My Fault" story starter cards for Fate Accelerated that I've had in my collection for many years, but haven't gotten around to trying out. I've even brought them to the monthly Meetups, but I made the mistake of bringing several other options. I'm a collector, and it also serves as a chance to show off my collection. By bringing multiple game options, I wind up competing with not only the other potential GMs, but also myself. By bringing only 1 game option, it's more likely that I'll actually get to play/run the thing that I bring.

That doesn't make the choice of what to bring much easier. Shortly after I had decided to do "It's Not My Fault," a random conversation on the internet reminded me of another game that I hadn't played in ages and I got excited about it all over again. For a while, I worried that the conversation that got me thinking about this other game (The Great Ork Gods) had been seen by the others in the Meetup group so I would be feel obligated to put off "It's Not My Fault" for at least another month. Then I went over the chat logs, found the conversation and realized that it was far from their prying eyes.

Which gives me something to present for next month.